CALCULATING PARAMETERS OF HEMISPHERE PART DRAWING IN THE DIE WITH AN ELASTIC ELEMENT
https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2017-4-62-68
Abstract
The paper provides a method to obtain hemisphere part in a die where the part surface is formed by the counter die. This is due to the tool design with a steel elastic element placed around the punch. Such process scheme allows for two different processes combined in one tool: drawing and calibration. Drawing sphere-like parts requires calibration since the part has a large area that is not in contact with the punch and die where the part looses stability and starts to buckle. The elastic element made of spring steel and placed around the hard punch calibrates part at the final drawing stage. The paper provides a forming scheme to obtain hemisphere parts with a relative thickness S′ = S/D0·100 % = 1,5÷0,15. Process parameters are evaluated using the engineering method. Geometrical parameters are calculated for the Steel 1060 elastic element for hemisphere part drawing of aluminum alloy 5056 with a thickness of 0,5 to 10 mm. The size of a gap between the punch and elastic element is determined. Maximum stresses occurring in the elastic element when forming are calculated. It is found that the elastic element has no plastic deformation. It is proposed to use the elastic element to produce parts with accurate geometrical dimensions and compensate elastic restitution.
About the Authors
E. S. NesterenkoRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate professor, Department of Metal Forming
F. V. Grechnikov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Prof., Acad. of RAS, Head of Department of Metal Forming
References
1. Romanovskij V.P. Spravichnic po holodnoy shtampovke [Cold stamping handbook]. Leningrad: Machinistroenie, 1979.
2. Storogev M.V. Teoriya obrabotki metallov davleniem [Theory of pressure metal treatment]. Moscow: Machinistroenie, 1977.
3. Marciniak, Z. Duncan, J.L. Hu, S.J. Mechanics of sheet metal forming. 2-nd Ed. Chennai, India: Butter-worth-Heinemann (Printed and bound in Great Britain, Planta Tree), 2002.
4. Pearson C.E., Parkins R.N. The extrusion of metals. Lon-don: Chapman & Hall, 1961.
5. Dem’yanenko E.G. A Technique of shaping the barrel-type pats. Russ. Aeronaut. 2014.Vol. 57. No. 2. P. 204— 211.
6. Dem’yanenko E.G. Formoobrazovanie tonkostennix osesimmetrichnix detaley vipukloy i vognutoy formi na osnove processa otbortovki [Forming of thin-walled axisimmetric parts with buckled and concave shape based on bead forming process]. Zagotovitelnie proizvodstva v ma-shinostroenii. 2014. No. 7. P. 23—28.
7. Erisov Y.A., Grechnikov F.V. Vliynie parametrof tekctury na ustoychivost processof formoobrazovaniy anizotrop-nix zagotovok [Influence of structure parameters on process stability of anisotropic blanks’ forming]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2012. No. 4. P. 293—298.
8. Chen Jun, Shi Xiao-xiang, Ruan Xue-yu. Numerical simulation-driven optimization of sheet metal drawing part shape. Trans Nonferr. Met. Soc. China. 2003. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 845—848.
9. En-zhi Gao, Hong-wei Li, Hong-chaoKou, Hui Chang, Jinshan Li, Lian Zhou. Influences of material parameters on deep drawing of thin-walled hemispheric surface part. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China. 2009. Vol. 19. P. 433— 477.
10. Jie Wu, Zengsheng Ma, Yichun Zhou, Chunsheng Lu. Prediction of failure modes during deep drawing of metal sheets with nickel coating. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013. Vol. 29. No. 11. P. 1059—1066.
11. Isachenkov E.I. Shtampovka rezinoy i gidkostu [Rubber and liquid forming]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1967.
12. Birukov N.M. Formoobrazovanie detaley iz listovogo ma-teriala gidroelastichnoy sredoy po gostkomu puansonu [Sheet metal forming by hydro-elastic fluid long solid punch]: Pat. 2212970 (RF). 2003.
13. Tomilov M.F., Shagunov A.V. Sposob vitygki elastichnoy sredoy [Forming method by elastic fluid]: Pat. 2162759 (RF). 2001.
14. Golovlev V.D. Rascheti processov listovoy shtampovki [Designing of sheet metal forming processes]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1974.
15. Sannders W.T. Deep Drawing method and apparatus: Pat. 3494169 (USA). 1970.
16. Bor-Tsuen Lin, Kun-Min Huang, Chun-Chih Kuo, Wen-Ting Wang. Improvement of deep drawability by using punch surfaces with microridges. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015. Vol. 225. P. 275—285.
17. Walde T., Riedel H. Simulation of earing during deep drawing of magnesium alloy AZ31. Acta Mater. 2007. Vol. 55. P. 867—874.
18. Moshnin Е.N. Tehnologiy shtampovki krupno gabaritnih detaley [Forming technique large machine part]. Mos-cow: Mashinostroenie, 1973.
19. Popov I.P., Zimarev M.V., Nesterenko E.S. Usovershenstvovanie processov shtampovki tonkostennih konicheskih detaley [Improvement of thin wall cone shape parts’ forming]. Zagotovitelnie proizvodstva v mashinostroenii. 2012. No. 7. P. 18—21.
20. Nesterenko E.S., Popov I.P., Kuzin A.O. Modelirovanie operatsii dvuhuglovoiy gibki v shtampe s uprugim prigi-mom [Modeling of operation two-angular are flexible in a stamp with an elastic element]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 25—30.
21. Boyarshinov S.V. Osnovi stroitelnoy mahaniki mash-in [Bases of machinery structural analyses]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1987.
22. Davis J.R. Heat-resistant materials. ASM International, 1997.
23. Nesterenko E. Stamping of hemispheric surface parts in die tool equipped with steel elastic element. Key Eng. Mater. 2016. Vol. 684. Р. 234—241.
Review
For citations:
Nesterenko E.S., Grechnikov F.V. CALCULATING PARAMETERS OF HEMISPHERE PART DRAWING IN THE DIE WITH AN ELASTIC ELEMENT. Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2017;(4):62-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2017-4-62-68