Preview

Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy

Advanced search

Pilot tests for processing oxidized copper ores from the Erdenetiin Ovoo deposit using heap leaching

https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2025-1-5-13

Abstract

In the current context of declining reserves of high-grade copper sulfide ores, oxidized ores are becoming an important source of mineral raw materials containing non-ferrous and precious metals. Traditional flotation processing of these ores results in low-grade concentrates with poor metal extraction rates (40–60 %). Heap leaching is considered the most promising method for processing such ores. As a result of prolonged intensive mining at the Erdenetiin Ovoo deposit (Erdenet, Mongolia), approximately 800 million tonnes of oxidized ore dumps with an average copper content of 0.45–0.48 % have accumulated within the open-pit boundary. Global experience in processing such secondary raw materials demonstrates the high economic efficiency of copper extraction through heap leaching, followed by solvent extraction and electrowinning (SX-EW) of copper from the pregnant leach solution. For the State-owned Enterprise Erdenet, it is essential to conduct leaching studies on oxidized ores and pilot testing of this technology on the ore from existing ore dumps. To achieve this, 35 boreholes were drilled in the dumps (16 in dump No. 8a and 19 in dump No. 12), from which core samples were collected. The mineralogical composition of the oxidized copper ore samples was analyzed, and the effect of heap leaching parameters (ore particle size, solution acidity, etc.) on copper recovery into the pregnant leach solution was determined. To more accurately assess the recoverable copper from the two dumps, composite samples were collected from each borehole, and large-scale heap leaching tests were conducted in 30 open-cycle columns. The test results showed that copper extraction rate from dump No. 8a ranged from 35.8 % to 69.1 %, with an average of 56.0 %, while dump No. 12 exhibited extraction rates ranging from 51.8 % to 77.4 %, with an average of 63.6 %.

About the Authors

S. Gantulga
SOE “Erdenet Enterprise”
Mongolia

Sambuu Gantulga – Master of science in engineering, Senior Engineer of the Technological park project unit



Ts. Tsend-Ayush
SOE “Erdenet Enterprise”
Mongolia

Tserendagva Tsend-Ayush – Ph.D, Head of the Development Department



B. Altantuyaа
Mongolian University of Science and Technology
Mongolia

Byambasuren Altantuyaа – Ph.D, Professor, Lecturer of the Institute of geology and mining engineering



S. V. Mamyachenkov
Ural Federal University n.a. the First President of Russia B.N. Eltsin
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Mamyachenkov – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Head of the Department of metallurgy of non-ferrous metals



References

1. Purevdash M. Prospects for hydrometallurgical processing of oxidized copper ores and sulfide copper concentrates as an integral part of the new technology for complex processing of the Erdenetiin Ovoo deposit. Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 2011;189:313—316. (In Russ.).

2. Bartos P.J. SX-EW copper and the technology cycle. Resources Policy. 2002;28(3-4):85—94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(03)00025-4

3. Ansah E.O., Jyoti A., Black J.R., Haese R.R. The importance of reaction mechanisms and coupled dissolution with reprecipitation (CDR) reactions when modelling copper leaching in heap systems. Minerals Engineering. 2023;203:108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108357

4. Trujillo J.Y., Cisternas L.A., Galves E.D., Mellado M.E. Optimal design and planning of heap leaching process. Application to copper oxide leaching. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2014;92(2): 308—317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.07.027

5. Mortazavi A., Abbasloo Z., Ebrahimi L., Keshavars A., Masoomi A. Geotechnical investigation and design of leaching heap No. 2, Meydook copper mine, Iran. Minerals Engineering. 2015;79:185—195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.010

6. Robertson S.W., Staden P.J., Cherkaev A., Petersen J. Properties governing the flow of solution through crushed ore for heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2022; 208:105811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105811

7. Lizama H.M. In-situ leaching of copper from spent heaps. Hydrometallurgy. 2023;215:105997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105997

8. Damdinzhav Zh., Sizyakov V.M., Brichkin V.P., Andreev E.E., Boduen A.Ya. Practice of heap leaching of refractory ores of the Erdenetiin Ovoo deposit. Obogashchenie rud. 2009;(5):3—5. (In Russ.).

9. Column Leaching Procedure. https://www.911metallurgist.com/hydrometallurgy-testing/ (accessed: 01.03.2024).

10. Staden P.J., Kolesnikov A.V., Petersen J. Comparative assessment of heap leach production data — 1. A procedure for deriving the batch leach curve. Minerals Engineering. 2017;101:47—57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.11.009

11. Robertson S.W. Development of an integrated heap leach solution flow and mineral leaching model. Hydrometallurgy. 2017;169:79—88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.12.010

12. Wang L., Yin S., Wu A. Ore agglomeration behavior and its key controlling factors in heap leaching of lowgrade copper minerals. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;279:123705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123705

13. Apua M.C., Mapilane S. Leaching kinetics and predictive models for elements extraction from copper oxide ore in sulphuric acid. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2021;121:313—320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.005

14. Liu W., Hashemzadeh M. Solution flow behavior in response to key operating parameters in heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2017;169:183—191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.01.007

15. Kimball B.E., Rimstidt J.D., Brantley S.L., Chalcopyrite dissolution rate laws. Applied Geochemistry. 2010;25(7):972—983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.03.010

16. Cerqueira B., Covelo E.F., Rúa-Díaz S. Contrasting mobility of arsenic and copper in a mining soil: A comparative column leaching and pot testing approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022;318:115530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115530

17. Lizama H.M. How copper dump leaching works. Minerals Engineering. 2021;171:107075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107075

18. Ansah E.O., Jyoti A., Black J.R., Haese R.R. The importance of reaction mechanisms and coupled dissolution with reprecipitation (CDR) reactions when modelling copper leaching in heap systems. Minerals Engineering. 2023;203:108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023/108357

19. Lichtner P.C. The quasi-stationary state approximation to coupled mass transport and fluid-rock interaction in a porous medium. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1988;52:143—165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(88)90063-4

20. Dzhartaeva I., Massakbayeva S. Investigation of factors affecting the process of heap leaching of copper ores. Polish Journal of Science. 2021;40:13—16.

21. Jamsa-Jounela S.L., Cziprian Z. Heap leaching simulation. In: IFAC Symposium on Automation in Mining, Mineral and Metal Processing. Cologne, Germany, 1998. P. 43—48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)35854-8


Review

For citations:


Gantulga S., Tsend-Ayush Ts., Altantuyaа B., Mamyachenkov S.V. Pilot tests for processing oxidized copper ores from the Erdenetiin Ovoo deposit using heap leaching. Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2025;(1):5-13. https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2025-1-5-13

Views: 171


ISSN 0021-3438 (Print)
ISSN 2412-8783 (Online)