Choosing sorbent for fluoride ion removal from zinc sulfate solutions
https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2020-4-7-15
Abstract
The process of zinc sulfate solution purification determines process, economic and environmental production results. Since recently there has been a constant increase in the content of halides in pregnant solutions of zinc production due to the processing of technogenic zinc-containing raw materials, it is relevant to search for methods for removing halides, in particular fluorine, from zinc solutions using a variety of materials. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the effectiveness of akaganeite as an sorbent for fluoride ion removal from zinc sulfate solutions. When using akaganeite, it is especially important to choose a carrier for the sorbent since the nanosized particles of akaganeite make it difficult to clean the solution from the sorbent. Most suitable carriers for this purpose in terms of surface characteristics and physicochemical properties are gypsum and red mud of alumina production. Experiments used a zinc sulfate solution (100 g/dm3 Zn2+, pH = 4.5) containing 26.8–111.4 mg/dm3 F–. The maximum fluoride ion capacity was shown by red mud due to the formation of F–Al complexes. The highest fluorine recovery was demonstrated by red mud with impregnated akaganeite at elevated temperature that facilitates showing akaganeite properties and accelerates the surface ОН– ↔ F– exchange process. The gypsum-based adsorbent successfully removed fluorine due to calcium ions released and calcium fluoride formed. The amount of fluorine removed depends on the sorbent material, its consumption, sorption duration and temperature. The optimal processing conditions were (at pH = 5.5): temperature – 60 °C, process duration – 120 min, composite sorbent consumption – 20÷30 g/dm3. It was shown that composite sorbents based on red mud or gypsum with impregnated akaganeite (β-FeOOH) are most suitable for cleaning zinc solutions from halides. These adsorbents make it possible to achieve the greatest capacity and degree of fluoride ion removal (up to 98–99 %) in the actual pH range of process solutions. The abovementioned sorbents can be regenerated in an alkali solution, and then reused (up to 3–4 cycles).
Keywords
About the Authors
S. V. MamyachenkovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Head of the Department of metallurgy non-ferrous metals (MNFM)
620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira str., 19
E. B. Kolmachikhina
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior engineer, Department of MNFM
620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira str., 19
D. I. Bludova
Russian Federation
Research engineer, Department of MNFM
620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira str., 19
O. S. Anisimova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associated prof., Department of MNFM
620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira str., 19
References
1. Panshin A.M., Leontyev L.I., Kozlov P.A., Dyubanov V.G., Zatonsky A.V., Ivakin D.A. Reprocessing technology of electric arc furnace dust Join Stock Company «Severstal» in Waelz treating of complex Join Stock Company «Chelyabinsk Zink Plant». Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii. 2012. No. 11. P. 4—6. (In Russ.)
2. Guezennec A.-G., Huber J.-C., Patisson F., Sessieq P., Birat J.-P., Ablitzer D. Dust formation in electric arc furnace: birth of the particles. Powder Technology. 2005. Vol. 157. No. 1-3. P. 2—11.
3. Toporkova Y., Mamyachenkov S., Anisimova O., Prodanova D. Ammonia leaching research of EAF dusts after Wealz-process. In: Metal 2019: Mater. 28th Inter. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials (Brno, 22—24 May 2019). P. 1387—1392.
4. Nyirenda R.L. The processing of steelmaking flue-dust: A review. Miner. Eng. 1991. Vol. 4. No. 7-11. P. 1003—1025.
5. Pickles C.A. Thermodynamic analysis of the selective chlorination of electric arc furnace dust. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008. Vol. 166. No. 2-3. P. 1030—1042.
6. Luo F., Inoue K. The removal of fluoride ion by using metal (III) — loaded Amberlite resins. Solv. Extr. Ion Exch. 2004. Vol. 22. P. 305—322.
7. Sollo Jr. F.W., Larson T.E., Mueller H.F. Fluoride removal from potable water supplies. University of Illinois, 1978.
8. Alain Tressaud (Ed.). Advances in fluorine science, fluorine and the environment, agrochemicals, archaeology. In: Green Chem. Water. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 2006.
9. Ghorai S., Pant K.K. Equilibrium, kinetics and breakthrough studies for adsorption of fluoride on activated alumina. Separat. Purific. Technol. 2005. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 265—271.
10. Sujana M.G., Thakur R.S., Rao S.B. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using alum sludge. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 1998. Vol. 206. P. 94—101.
11. Huang C.J., Liu J.C. Precipitate flotation of fluoride-containing wastewater from a semiconductor manufacturer. Water Res. 1999. Vol. 33. P. 3403—3412.
12. Popat K.M., Anand P.S., Dasare B.D. Selective removal of fluoride ions from water by the aluminium form of the aminomethylphosphonic acid-type ion exchanger. React. Polym. 1994. Vol. 23. P. 23—32.
13. Solangi I.B., Memon S., Bhanger M.I. Removal of fluoride from aqueous environment by modified Amberlite resin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009. Vol. 171. P. 815—819.
14. Meenakshi S., Viswanathan N. Identification of selective ion-exchange resin for fluoride sorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007. Vol. 308. P. 438—450.
15. Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Role of metal ion incorporation in ion exchange resin on the selectivity of fluoride. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009. Vol. 162. P. 920—930.
16. Simons R. Trace element removal from ash dam waters by nanofiltration and diffusion dialysis. Desalination. 1993. Vol. 89. P. 325—341.
17. Sehn P. Fluoride removal with extra low energy reverse osmosis membranes: three years of large scale field experience in Finland. Desalination. 2008. Vol. 223. P. 73—84.
18. Adhikary S.K., Tipnis U.K., Harkare W.P., Govindan K.P. Defluoridation during esalination of brackish water by electrodialysis. Desalination. 1989. Vol. 71. P. 301—312.
19. Ayoob S., Gupta A.K., Bhat V.T. A conceptual overview on sustainable technologies for defluoridation of drinking water and removal mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008. Vol. 38. P. 401—470.
20. Samadi M.T., Zarrabi M., Sepehr M.N., Ramhormozi S.M., Azizian S., Amrane A. Removal of fluoride ions by ion exchange resin: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Environ. Eng. Managem. J. 2014. Vol. 13. No 1. P. 205—214.
21. Mohapatra M., Anand S., Mishra B. K., Giles D. E., Singh P. Review of fluoride removal from drinking water. J. Environ. Managem. 2009. Vol. 91. No 1. P. 67—77.
22. Miretzky P., Cirelli A.F. Fluoride removal from water by chitosan derivatives and composites: A review. J. Fluorine Chem. 2011. Vol. 132. P. 231—240.
23. Bhatnagar A., Kumar E., Sillanpää M. Fluoride removal from water by adsorption: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2011. Vol. 171. No. 3. P. 811—840.
24. Grassi M., Kaykioglu G., Belgiorno V., Lofrano G. Removal of emerging contaminants from water and wastewater by adsorption process. In: Emerging Compounds Removal from Wastewater, Springer Briefs in Molecular Science. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. P. 15—37.
25. Daёbrowski A. Adsorption—from theory to practice. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001. Vol. 93. No. 1-3. P. 135—224.
26. Vardhan V.M.C., K.J. Removal of fluoride from water using low cost materials. In: Proc. Fifteenth Intern. Water Technol. Conf. (IWTC-15). 2011.
27. Xu X., Li Q., Cui H., Pang J., An H., Wang W., Zhai J. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution on magnesia-loaded fly ash cenospheres. Desalination. 2011. Vol. 272. No. 1-3. P. 233—239.
28. Chen N., Zhang Z., Feng C., Li M., Zhu D., Chen R., Sugiura N. An excellent fluoride sorption behavior of ceramic adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010. Vol. 183. No. 1-3. P. 460—465.
29. Narena G., Ohashi H., Okauea Y., Yokoyama T. Adsorption kinetics of silicic acid on akaganeite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013. Vol. 399. P. 87—91.
30. Mamyachenkov S.V., Nemchinova N.V., Egorov V.V., Pazylkhan R.N. Review of promising methods of fluoride and chloride ions removal from the solutions for zinc electrolyte preparation for the electroextraction stage. Vestnik IrGTU. 2016. Vol. 111. No. 4. P. 155—169. (In Russ.).
31. Trushko V.L., Utkov V.A., Bazhin V.Y. Topicality and possibilities for complete processing of red mud of aluminous production. J. Mining Institute. 2017. Vol. 227. P. 547—553.
32. Lei D., Guo L., Sun W., Liu J., Miao C. Study on properties of untreated FGD gypsum-based high-strength building materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017. Vol. 153. P. 765—773.
33. Sun M., Hou J., Cheng G., Baig S.A., Tan L., Xu X. The relationship between speciation and release ability of mercury in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum. Fuel. 2014. Vol 125. P. 66—72.
34. Tsai W.T., Lai C.W., Hsien K.J. Effect of particle size of activated clay on the adsorption of paraquat from aqueous solution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003. Vol. 263. No. 1. P. 29—34.
35. Tor A., Danaoglu N., Arslan G., Cengeloglu Y. Removal of fluoride from water by using granular red mud: Batch and column studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009. Vol 164. P. 271—278.
Review
For citations:
Mamyachenkov S.V., Kolmachikhina E.B., Bludova D.I., Anisimova O.S. Choosing sorbent for fluoride ion removal from zinc sulfate solutions. Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2020;(4):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0021-3438-2020-4-7-15